
HCS2000TM
HCS2000
Tips and Frequently Asked
Questions
Please review these notes
before contacting McTrans for technical support. If you do
contact McTrans, please have your HCS2000 registration number
available. It can be found by choosing Help then "About HCS2000"
on the Main Menu. Your registration number is just below the header
information.
Last updated
December 12, 2003.
For Tips and
Frequently Asked Questions related to HCS-3, click here.
For more information, please
read the Did You Know by clicking here.
Version:
Does the
upgrade from HCS-3 to HCS2000 add new modules, upgrade
only changed ones, or is it a complete, new set?
This release comprises a
complete installation of HCS in which Freeways, Weaving, Ramps,
Multilane, TwoLane, Signals, Unsignal, Arterials (Urban
Streets), Transit and the Main Menu have been upgraded.
Freeway Facilities is incorporated as a spreadsheet with a new
module in development. New versions of other modules
(Pedestrians and Bicycles) are being planned.
What changed
from HCS-3 to HCS2000?
New
features include:
Formatted
Reports: An optional report which presents the
results in an web-like format (HTML) just like the HCM2000
worksheets can be viewed and printed upon request. This
feature is now available in the Signals, Unsignal, Arterials,
Freeways and Multilane modules and will be provided in the
other modules as automatic updates. By selecting the Formatted
Report button on the toolbar, the lower pane will display the
report selected in the pull-down "quick jump" list in this
form.
IMPORTANT It is strongly recommended that the Text View be
selected while entering or modifying data.
In
this release, users must have version 5.01 or higher (version
5.5SP1 or higher preferred) of the Internet Explorer and make
sure the setting in "Tools > Internet Options > Advanced
> Printing" is set to "Print background colors and images" for
these reports to be properly displayed and printed. To suppress
the automatic header and/or footer (if desired), simply blank
the appropriate field(s) in the "File > Page Setup" screen.
Windows should be set to small fonts (display
properties) and the Internet Explorer should be set to medium fonts
(View...Text Size) for best results on most systems.
Note
that Internet Explorer need not be the default browser, and
other browsers (such as Netscape) may continue to be used.
Internet Explorer need only be installed. Users that do not have
Internet Explorer will be able to use HCS2000 but will not have
the added functionality of Formatted Reports.
Quick
Entry Screen: An optional screen provides for lane
configuration and volume data entry for intersection analysis
in the Signals and Unsignals modules. This screen
interacts with the normal data entry screen to maintain
consistent data in both.
Global
Field Spinners: Initially in the Signals and
Unsignal (TWSC only initially), global spinners are provided
for updating the PHF (more fields coming) in all movements at
once. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis can be
performed by using the spinner provided in the volume field to
increment all volumes by a specified percentage.
HCS2000
incorporates the procedures as prescribed in the new Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM2000) as described in general below:
Basic Freeway Segments: HCM
Chapter 23 (1997 HCM Chapter 3) uses revised passenger-car
equivalents for heavy-vehicle factors with slight changes in LOS
thresholds and free flow speeds due to metric conversion.
Freeway Weaving: HCM Chapter 24
(1997 HCM Chapter 4) uses revised passenger-car
equivalents for heavy-vehicle factors, recalibrated speed
equations in metric units, and redefines the
capacity/breakdown conditions.
Ramps and Ramp Junctions: HCM
Chapter 25 (1997 HCM Chapter 5) uses revised
passenger-car equivalents for heavy-vehicle factors,
streamlines the process of determining when a ramp junction is
isolated or affected by nearby ramps, and clarifies breakdown
conditions for predicting speeds across all lanes, not just
lanes 1 and 2, for facility analysis.
Multilane Highways: HCM Chapter
21 (1997 HCM Chapter 7) uses revised passenger-car equivalents
for heavy-vehicle factors with minor changes in the LOS
thresholds.
Two-Lane Highways: HCM Chapter 20 (1997 HCM Chapter 8) incorporates a
new methodology based on speed and percent time spent following
(PTSF), using two classes of two-lane highways, each having its
own LOS criteria, with the base capacity increased from 2,800
to 3,200 pcph in both directions. A new directional analysis
gives speed and PTSF with MOE-specific heavy-vehicle factors
and the capability to analyze passing lanes.
Signalized
Intersections: HCM2000 Chapter 16 (1997 HCM
Chapter 9) incorporated two major additions, includingnew saturation flow
adjustment factors for pedestrians, bicycles and
protected-permissive left turns from shared lanes and added
a maximum back of queue length estimation for
the average and several percentile values.
Unsignalized Intersections:
HCM Chapter 17 (1997 HCM Chapter 10) modified the flared
right-turn procedure with other changes incorporated in the 1997 HCM.
Urban Streets: HCM2000
Chapter 15 (1997 HCM Chapter 11) was renamed from Arterial Streets with
all other changes incorporated in the 1997 HCM.
Transit: HCM Chapter 27
(1997 HCM Chapter 12) incorporates a new methodology that
focuses on service availability and quality, and emphasizes bus
operation on surface streets.
Freeway Facilities: HCM
Chapter 22 (1997 HCM Chapter 6) incorporates a new set of
procedures to provide quality of service for directional freeway
facilities. This analysis permits the analysis of
multiple contiguous segments over multiple time intervals and
integrates the methods in HCM Chapters 23, 24 and 25 for undersaturated
analysis and extends these methods to oversaturated conditions.
Demand and/ or capacity can vary in each time interval for any
segment and the effect of traffic incidents, geometric
improvement and ramp metering can be tested, with queues on the
freeway mainline and ramps predicted at the end of each time
interval. The HOV analysis is limited with only
performance measures given without a facility-wide LOS.
Note: This module has been initially
implemented as a research-level spreadsheet.)
Pedestrians:
HCM Chapter 18 (1997 HCM Chapter 13)updated and expanded on pedestrian
characteristics data, added a new analyses for shared ped-bike
paths and now bases intersection LOS primarily on pedestrian
delay.
(Note: This module has not yet been
implemented in HCS2000.)
Bicycles: HCM Chapter 19
(1997 HCM Chapter 14) incorporates a newmethodology and provides
exclusive and shared bike path analysis is based on
passing/meeting with LOS is based on speed and delay on the
urban street.
(Note:
This module has not yet been implemented in HCS2000.)
General:
I double
clicked on an HCS2000 menu icon and the corresponding
chapter opened twice.
Modules are launched from
the HCS2000 menu using pushbuttons. These are activated
by a single click of the mouse, so multiple clicks will result
in multiple instances of a module.
Are all XML files compatible
with all versions of HCS2000?
All
XML data sets must be created with and read by version 4.1d to ensure
data integrity.
Coding:
In
entering data, why doesn't the "Enter" key advance the cursor to
the next field?
In a truly
"Windows-compatible" program, the "Enter" key inserts data into
the current field and causes an update or recalculation. The
"Tab" key is reserved for advancing to the next field (and, in HCS2000,
this also causes a recalculation).
If I
"Tab" to the next field, the default text is selected and I can
easily replace it. However, if I click into a field using the
mouse, why am I in edit mode and must delete the default text
before replacing it with my own?
If you simply
"double-click" into the field, the default text will be
selected.
Is
blanking a data field appropriate to negate its effects on
calculations?
All non-calculated data
entry fields must contain valid values (not a blank
field). For calculated data fields, blanking the field
will restore the calculated value.
I prefer
a date format that is different from the default. Can this be
changed?
HCS2000 uses the
date format that has been specified to be the default in
Windows (under Regional Settings).
Report:
Why does
the Report pane sometimes show areas that seem to have missing
data?
The labels defined for the
Report in most modules are fixed, regardless of the specific
input or results values in a particular analysis. If some data
are not needed, or some results not applicable, the labels
provided for those values still appear in the Report.
Why can't
I print only selected text in the Report pane?
This capability is planned
in a future release. For now, you can mark a portion of the
text in the Report pane, then right-click to copy it to the
Windows clipboard or save to a file for pasting or loading into
WordPad or your word processor for printing.
When
printing a report, why do the page breaks occur at the wrong
places?
Flexible page setup
attributes are planned in a future release. For now, you can
mark a portion of the text in the Report pane, then right-click
to copy it to the Windows clipboard or save to a file for
pasting or loading into WordPad or your word processor for printing with
your selected margins and page breaks.
When I
cut-and-paste into my word processing software from the Report
pane, why does some of the formatting get lost?
The Report pane is using a
"fixed" font with each character occupying exactly the same
amount of space. When pasting into a word processor, be sure
the font selected is also a "fixed" font (such as Courier) and
not a "proportional" one (such as Times New Roman).
Why is
there an asterisk (*), plus sign (+) or minus sign (-) appended
to certain values (sometimes but not always) in the output pane
and printed in the report?
If a calculated number is
edited, an asterisk (*) will be shown by that field and an
asterisk will appear in all results to indicate that an
intermediate value was adjusted.
Result thresholds at
decision points, such as density or delay, will have a plus (+)
or minus (-) appended if the calculated value at full precision
is greater (+) or less (-) than the rounded displayed value.
The asterisk (*), plus
(+), and minus (-) flags will appear when applicable in the
report pane and in the printed reports.
Ramps:
In a
diverge analysis, why does a two-lane off ramp with a
single-lane deceleration lane use a longer length?
The geometry illustrated
in the second example shown in HCM Exhibit 25-15 requires
coding the actual deceleration length in the "Length of Second
Deceleration Lane, LD2" and leaving the "Length of First
Deceleration Lane, LD1" equal to zero, for the correct
deceleration length to be used in the calculations.
Which
freeway volume is entered relative to the analysis ramp?
The
freeway volume is always immediately upstream of the analysis ramp, in
either a merge or diverge analysis, as illustrated in HCM 2000 Exhibit
25-2.
Why do some analyses result
in a blank for density?
Especially
when analyzing ramp junctions with long acceleration or
deceleration lanes, the density can actually be computed to be
negative (below zero) due to the nature of the density equation. In this
case, the value for density is suppressed (left blank).
Signals:
How do I
code phasing where the overlapping green time is shorter than
the clearance (yellow plus all-red) time?
The key in this situation
is to maintain the proper effective green times for all lane
groups. The recommended coding procedure is as follows:
- Code the actual green time for the
non-overlapping left-turn movement in the first phase, but
eliminate the clearance times (coding 0.0 for both yellow and
all-red).
- Code the additional time allocated to the
overlapping left-turn phase as the overlap (second) phase
actual green time with the displayed clearance (yellow plus
all-red) time.
- Increase the Start-up Lost Time for the Thru
movement in the overlap (second) phase by the amount of
clearance (yellow plus all-red) removed from the first phase.
This should result in correct effective green times (and g/C
ratios) for all affected movements while maintaining the
correct cycle length.
Why are
the delay and LOS values blank for some lane groups, approaches
or the intersection?
If the analysis results in
an estimate of greater than 999.9 seconds for a given lane
group, delay and LOS values for that lane group, and subsequent
approach and intersection values, are blank to indicate an out
of range condition.
Why does
changing the clearance times now affect the total lost time?
The yellow plus all-red
clearance times are part of the total lost time calculations in
HCM2000 (discussed on HCM Page 10-13). Users must be aware that
modifying the yellow and/or all-red values in the Phasing
Design may alter the total lost time being used in subsequent
calculations.
How are "sneakers"
accommodated in the current procedures?
The capacity of a
permitted-only left-turn movement is set equal to the number of
"sneakers" per cycle, multiplied by the number of cycles per
hour, when the opposing movement is sufficiently congested. The
number of left-turn sneakers is between 1 and 2 vehicles per
cycle, computed as a function of lane configuration and volume
distribution.
Why does
the analysis of a single-lane T intersection approach not
produce certain critical values?
Currently, in cases where
there is a single LR shared lane group with no thru lane, the
user must add a thru lane with no volume and a corresponding
thru phase in phasing design to obtain the values dependent on
critical movements, such as lost time/cycle, critical v/c and
sum (v/s) critical.
Unsignal:
Why
doesn't the program allow me to input three thru lanes on the
major street in TWSC?
As
stipulated in the HCM methodology, each major-street approach
can have up to two thru lanes and one exclusive right and/or
left turn lane. Each minor-street approach can have up to three
lanes, a maximum of one lane for each movement. This is a
limitation of the research on which the procedures are based.
What is
the difference between "channelized" right turn and an exclusive
right-turn lane?
The
"Channelized" button is activated only when the right-turning
traffic from the major road is separated by a triangular island
and has to comply with a stop or yield sign. This is
different from an exclusive right-turn lane, which does not
have to stop or yield.
What is coded in the
"duration" field and how does that affect the analysis?
In
TWSC and AWSC, the duration in used as a factor (T) in the
delay equation to model the effects of this period of analysis
in situations where the degree of saturation is greater than
about 0.9. In most cases, the recommended analysis period
is 15 minutes, or 0.25 hours.
When analyzing the effects of an upstream signal in
TWSC, what does the "progressed flow" value represent?
Progressed flow is the sum of the feeding volume,
from the upstream intersection, that moves during protected
through and left turn (green arrow) phases. Approach
volume at the unsignalized intersection may be higher than the
upstream progressed flow because it also includes upstream
left- and right-turn permitted movement flow, as well as any
mid-block flow.
|