|
|
TRANSYT-7FDid You Know? Frequently Asked QuestionsWhy is a movement failing when it has plenty of green time? When a movement is failing even though it has
enough green time, this
usually indicates queue spillback from a downstream intersection.
Use the wide output format to check "Time Full%" for the downstream
links, or use the Profile View screen to check "Link Full Flag" for the
downstream links. How do I get rid of legacy report warning messages 161, 165, or 167, which say that the upstream and downstream flows are significantly unbalanced?
The "automatic flow balancing" feature within
the Map View and the
Feeders screen is usually helpful for balancing the upstream and
downstream flows. However, if these flow balancing warning
messages persist even after using
automatic flow balancing, it implies that large vehicle volumes are
entering or leaving the roadway prior to the downstream signal.
If large vehicle volumes are entering the roadway from a
mid-block source, these mid-block volumes should be coded on the Edit
> Traffic screen, to achieve correct model results. If large vehicle volumes are exiting the
roadway
at a mid-block source, feeding flows can optionally be reduced on
the Edit > Feeders screen (to eliminate warning messages), but model
results will not be affected. What should I do if the program says "Relevant data could not be extracted from TRANSYT-7F output. Please check TRANSYT-7F input and output files for errors."
Go to the Edit > Analysis screen and switch
from Optimization to Simulation. Then perform a simulation-only
run. The legacy report should reveal any
input coding errors that are interfering with the optimization process. What is the best Performance Index to use for optimizing progression and bandwidth?
For optimizing bandwidth and progression speeds,
PROS/DI is recommended. PROS-only is rarely acceptable because
although it produces a good bandwidth, the minor movements are allowed
to fail. Delay-only optimization results in excessive stops and
fuel consumption. Fuel Consumption (minimization) is considered
to be a good compromise between bandwidth and delay-based
optimization. The Disutility Index (DI) is an effective
combination of minimizing delay and stops, but rarely produces a wide
bandwidth. Other objective functions involving Throughput and
Queuing Ratio should only be applied when conditions are severely
oversaturated. Why is the percentage of Total Stops sometimes reported as greater than 100%? Random-plus-oversaturation stops represent partial stops following a phase failure, where there is not enough green time to serve the queue. As such, individual vehicles could presumably stop multiple times (sometimes causing Total Stops% > 100%) before clearing the intersection, although these would not be considered "full stops" for the purposes of computing fuel consumption. In order to be considered a full stop, a vehicle must transition between the cruise speed and zero speed. TRANSYT-7F computes the fuel consumption due to random-plus-oversaturation stops differently than the fuel consumption due to uniform stops. The model assumes that random-plus-oversaturation stops are made while vehicles are traveling at the queue speed (the one at which the queue dissipates), while uniform stops are assumed to be made from cruise speed. What causes the following warning message: "The length of link 101 is not the same as the length of link 102". This statement is true, but why is it a warning? Link lengths
affect
the simulation of platoon dispersion. Some users code short turn
pocket storage lengths on the Edit > Traffic screen, but this could
cause incorrect simulation of
platoon
dispersion, because platoons must travel all the way from the
upstream
signal to the downstream signal. Therefore, even for turn
pockets,
link lengths on the Edit > Traffic screen should reflect the distance from upstream
signal
to downstream signal. The best way to model turn pocket lengths
(and queue spillover) is to code "Turn Bay Storage" values on the Edit
> Lanes screen. What causes “Processing Error 238”? This error message was added to prevent cycle length optimization using the stand-alone engine (T7FWin2.exe). A more robust methodology for cycle length optimization has been implemented externally (via TRANSYT-7F.exe). Therefore, running the engine (T7FWin2.exe) in the stand-alone mode could cause error message #238. Another thing that has caused the fatal error message for some users are input data files that have not yet been converted into release 10 or release 11 format. To circumvent this problem, simply go to the Edit > Analysis screen within TRANSYT-7F.exe, and request cycle length optimization on this screen. After running
hill-climb
cycle length optimization, or genetic algorithm optimization, how can I
view
the detailed output statistics?
To
get the full output report for the optimal timing plan, it is necessary
to
load and run the punch (*.pun) file that was generated
by the previous optimization run. Does TRANSYT-7F report the average queue length in the output? TRANSYT-7F reports the average or expected maximum back of queue length (including uniform queue, random queue, and residual queue). Actual queue lengths in the field have a 50/50 chance of being higher or lower than the average queue length reported by the program. Release 11 now provides 95th percentile maximum back of queues in the node summary reports. |